In a bold and somewhat controversial move, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. plans to require junior bankers to periodically certify their loyalty — essentially confirming that they haven’t secretly committed to jobs with rival firms. This decision reflects growing frustration on Wall Street as private equity firms aggressively poach young talent from top investment banks, sometimes even before training begins.
According to reports from insiders familiar with the plan, Goldman will ask first-year analysts to sign declarations every three months confirming they haven’t accepted offers from other employers. While Goldman Sachs declined to officially comment, this shift comes amid intensifying competition for financial talent and a wider debate on the ethics of early recruitment.
The War for Talent: On-Cycle Recruitment Gone Too Far?
The world of high finance and investment banking is no stranger to long hours and intense pressure. But in recent years, another layer of stress has emerged — the race among private equity (PE) firms to lock in junior bankers early, a process known as on-cycle recruitment.
Traditionally, analysts would spend two to three years at an investment bank before moving to a PE firm or hedge fund. However, firms like Blackstone, KKR, Apollo Global Management, and others now initiate recruiting just months after these analysts start their first job — and in some cases, even before the analyst program begins.
Industry Example: Apollo Takes a Stand
In June 2025, Apollo Global Management made headlines when CEO Marc Rowan announced that the firm would not interview or offer jobs to the Class of 2027, stating that it was unfair to pressure young professionals to commit before understanding their options.
“Asking students to make career decisions before they truly understand their options doesn’t serve them or our industry,” Rowan said.
This announcement was widely seen as a pushback against aggressive PE recruiting tactics, which some say create an unhealthy environment for early-career professionals.
JPMorgan’s Strict Policy: No Poaching Allowed
Goldman Sachs isn’t alone in tackling the issue. In June 2025, JPMorgan Chase & Co. took a hardline stance and warned incoming graduates that they would be fired immediately if caught accepting future-dated offers from other companies before completing 18 months at the bank.
The policy, according to JPMorgan insiders, is intended to prevent conflicts of interest and preserve the integrity of sensitive dealmaking activities. CEO Jamie Dimon himself spoke against early recruitment as far back as 2023, calling it “unethical” and harmful to all parties involved.
“It puts the kid in a terrible position… It puts us in a conflicted position. You are already working for somewhere else and you’re dealing with highly confidential information,” Dimon said at Georgetown University.
Why Banks Are Worried: Confidentiality at Stake
While it may appear heavy-handed, Goldman Sachs’ new loyalty certifications are aimed at protecting confidential deal data and reducing legal and reputational risk.
Junior analysts, even in their early months, often have access to:
- M&A deal pipelines
- Private company valuations
- Client presentations and financial models
- Sensitive restructuring plans
If a new analyst has already committed to a PE firm — a firm that could eventually bid on or acquire one of Goldman’s clients — the conflict of interest becomes serious.
This potential information leakage jeopardizes client trust and can threaten billion-dollar transactions. No investment bank can afford that.
Goldman’s Alumni Dilemma: Carrots and Sticks
Goldman Sachs has always prided itself on its strong alumni network. Many ex-Goldman employees go on to become partners at hedge funds, venture capitalists, or even CEOs of Fortune 500 companies. The firm is also known for its “boomerang hires” — people who leave and later return in senior roles.
But this latest move may strain those relationships. By asking analysts to effectively “pledge loyalty” every three months, the bank is walking a tightrope — balancing risk management with career mobility.
For analysts caught in the middle, it’s a difficult choice: Stay loyal and miss early offers, or secure a long-term role at a PE firm and risk being fired or blackballed.
A Broader Industry Reckoning?
The growing tension between investment banks and private equity giants is exposing structural issues in the recruitment pipeline:
- MBAs are no longer the primary feeder for top PE firms — undergraduate analysts are.
- Early commitments distort performance reviews and mentorship quality.
- Firms fear being left behind if they don’t participate in the on-cycle madness.
Some industry observers believe that unless there’s a collective agreement or regulatory standard, the pressure on young bankers will only worsen.
RAM Price Hike 2025 Explained: Beyond AI and Into Supply Shocks