In a significant development, the Supreme Court of India on Monday, July 14, 2025, refused to entertain a petition that challenged the extension of the ban on the Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). The judicial tribunal’s order confirming the extension, dated July 24, 2024, was upheld by the apex court.
The Centre had earlier extended the ban on SIMI for five more years under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAPA), citing national security concerns and the group’s involvement in unlawful and terror-related activities.
What Did the Supreme Court Say?
A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta dismissed the plea, effectively validating the tribunal’s findings and the government’s decision to renew the ban on SIMI.
The court made it clear that it found no merit in the challenge against the tribunal’s order and reaffirmed the Centre’s authority to designate organizations as unlawful under Section 3(1) of the UAPA.
Background: What is SIMI?
The Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) was established on April 25, 1977, as a student and youth wing associated with the Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (JEIH). However, it severed ties with JEIH in 1993, declaring itself an independent organization through a formal resolution.
SIMI positioned itself as an Islamic revivalist organization, advocating for the establishment of Islamic rule and rejecting secularism, democracy, and nationalism. Over time, it became increasingly radical, leading to its eventual outlawing by the government.
SIMI’s Ban Timeline
- 2001: SIMI was first declared an “unlawful association” during the Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led NDA government, under the UAPA.
- Subsequent Bans: The ban has been extended multiple times over the years in 2003, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2019.
- Latest Ban: On January 29, 2024, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) reimposed the ban for five more years, citing ongoing threats posed by SIMI.
- Judicial Tribunal Review: A special judicial tribunal constituted under the UAPA reviewed the ban and upheld it on July 24, 2024.
Why is SIMI Considered a Threat?
According to the Centre, SIMI has been actively involved in fomenting terrorism, disturbing communal harmony, and threatening India’s sovereignty. The Ministry of Home Affairs stated that:
- SIMI members have been linked to terror modules across states.
- The group has a history of radicalizing youth and spreading extremist ideologies.
- Several criminal cases have been registered against SIMI leaders and operatives under laws such as:
- Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967
- Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- Explosives Act, 1908
- Arms Act, 1959
The government noted that despite being banned, SIMI has been operating covertly and attempting to regroup under different names.
Legal Basis of the Ban
Under Section 3(1) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, the Central Government is empowered to declare an organization as “unlawful” if it is found to be:
- Involved in activities against the integrity and sovereignty of India.
- Engaged in promoting enmity between different groups.
- Involved in any activity that disrupts communal harmony.
The judicial tribunal, which reviewed the evidence presented by the Ministry, concluded that SIMI’s continued activities justify the extension of the ban.
Controversies & Allegations
SIMI has often been in the news for its alleged links to several high-profile terror attacks, including:
- The 2006 Mumbai train bombings
- The 2008 Ahmedabad blasts
- Alleged connections with the Indian Mujahideen, a group considered a breakaway faction of SIMI.
Although many members were arrested and convicted, human rights groups have occasionally criticized the lack of transparency and alleged targeting of innocent youth in SIMI-related crackdowns.
SIMI’s Attempts to Rebrand and Resurface
Security agencies have consistently warned that former SIMI cadres have tried to regroup under different banners, using new names and social welfare fronts to evade legal scrutiny. The government maintains vigilance over such attempts through continuous monitoring and intelligence inputs.
Reactions to the Supreme Court Verdict
While the government and national security officials welcomed the Supreme Court’s stand, some activist groups expressed concern over prolonged bans and lack of rehabilitation mechanisms for youth who were formerly associated with the group but later disengaged.
Legal experts argue that while national security is paramount, regular judicial reviews and due process are vital in such cases to prevent misuse.
Travel Food Services Shares Dip Post-Listing: Buy, Sell or Hold?